Obesity
The SecretObesity is treated in The Secret as a condition that the law of attraction attributes to thought. Rather than presenting weight only as a medical or nutritional matter, the book makes it part of its larger argument that inner states become bodily and worldly effects. Its proposed remedy is a deliberate redirection of attention: away from losing weight and toward already possessing a healthy, satisfying body.
Definition and Causal Theory
The book begins its discussion by applying the Creative Process to people who are overweight and want to lose weight. Its first instruction is paradoxical: focusing on losing weight allegedly attracts the continuing experience of having to lose weight. Dieting therefore fails, in this account, because the dieter remains mentally fixed on the unwanted condition. The desired object of attention must be the preferred state itself, not the struggle against its absence.
The text then makes a stronger claim that overweight was created through thought. It describes this as thinking “fat thoughts,” whether consciously recognized or not, and insists that a person cannot think “thin thoughts” while remaining fat without violating the law of attraction. Explanations such as a slow thyroid, a slow metabolism, or hereditary body size are characterized as disguises for those thoughts: once a person accepts such a condition as applicable and believes it, the book says, that belief becomes part of the person’s experience and perpetuates the overweight state.
Personal Example and the Rejection of Food as Primary Cause
The argument is given autobiographical force through the author’s account of becoming overweight after the birth of two daughters. She attributes the change to messages she had heard and read claiming that losing weight after one baby was difficult and after a second was even harder. By accepting those messages, she says, she summoned the condition to herself. She describes how noticing that she had “beefed up” allegedly attracted further “beefing up,” until her small frame reached 143 pounds.
Food is identified as the most common belief attached to weight gain, and the author says she once held that belief as well. The book rejects the idea that food itself is responsible, calling it an unhelpful belief and asserting that the thought that food causes weight gain is what gives food that causal role. This places thought before physiology in the book’s hierarchy of explanation: bodily weight is treated as an effect, while the interpretation surrounding food becomes the primary cause.
The Creative Process for a Preferred Body
The book defines perfect weight personally, as the weight that feels good to the individual; other people’s opinions do not count in that definition. It illustrates the point with the image of a thin person who eats freely while declaring that any desired food can be eaten without changing their weight. In response, the Genie of the Universe is said to answer, “Your wish is my command,” turning expectation into the mechanism that supposedly maintains the body.
The prescribed Creative Process begins with asking. The person must become clear about the weight desired and form a picture of what the body will look like at that weight. The book recommends finding photographs of oneself at the preferred weight and looking at them often; if such photographs do not exist, it suggests using pictures of the desired body instead. Visualization is therefore not an occasional fantasy but a repeated practice intended to make the imagined condition the dominant mental reference point.
Health, Perfection, and the Body
The discussion of obesity belongs to a wider account of bodily transformation in which health is produced by harmonious thought, love, gratitude, and attention to perfection. The book says that healing through the mind can work alongside medicine, especially when medicine is needed to relieve acute pain and allow a person to concentrate on health. This qualification acknowledges medicine as having a place, even while the larger framework assigns thought a central causal power.
The body is also described as giving feedback about an imbalanced perspective or a failure to be loving and grateful. Within that interpretation, symptoms are not simply terrible intrusions but signs of disharmony. The text extends the same logic to illness, aging, and bodily form, declaring that “imperfect thoughts” cause disease, poverty, and unhappiness and urging readers to think thoughts of perfection. It presents the body as capable of becoming healthy, perfectly formed, and even youthful through consistent thought, so that obesity appears not as an isolated condition but as one instance of a comprehensive mind-over-body doctrine.
Attention, Agency, and Limits of the Doctrine
The book repeatedly treats attention as an active force. It warns that focusing on disease creates more diseased cells and advises people to see themselves as living in perfectly healthy bodies while leaving doctors to care for disease. The same structure governs obesity: attention directed at the unwanted condition is said to reproduce it, whereas attention directed at the desired condition is said to summon it.
This framework gives the individual an expansive sense of agency. Once people understand and master their thoughts and feelings, the book says, they discover how they create their own reality and thereby find freedom and power. It also presents choice as unavoidable and personal: readers may use the knowledge or let it go, but the decision remains theirs. Yet the same emphasis can make bodily difficulty appear as a personal product of mistaken thinking. The text offers little room for uncertainty, recurrence, social conditions, or biological complexity; its central promise is that a change in thought can redirect the body toward the state the individual imagines, feels, and consistently attends to.